Search 
The Supreme Court’s Latest Move on AR-15s and the Second Amendment
The U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to hear a pivotal case challenging Maryland’s ban on AR-15 rifles, but conservative justices strongly hinted that they may soon take up the issue—potentially reshaping the future of civilian firearm ownership in America.
While only three justices—Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch—voted to review Maryland’s AR-15 ban, Justice Brett Kavanaugh signaled that he would likely provide the crucial fourth vote in a future case. In a written statement, Kavanaugh called Maryland’s law “questionable” and predicted that the Court “should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next Term or two.”
This decision leaves in place a ruling from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld Maryland’s ban by declaring that AR-15s are not “constitutionally protected arms” under the Second Amendment. However, the Supreme Court’s conservative wing appears poised to revisit the issue as similar cases work their way through lower courts.
Why the AR-15 Debate Matters
The AR-15 is the most popular civilian rifle in America, with tens of millions of law-abiding gun owners using it for self-defense, sport shooting, and hunting. Yet, it has also been a focal point in the gun control debate following high-profile mass shootings.
Maryland enacted its ban in 2013 after the tragic Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Since then, eight other states have implemented similar restrictions on AR-15s and other semi-automatic rifles. Proponents argue these laws reduce gun violence, while opponents insist they infringe on constitutional rights.
Justice Thomas, in a fiery dissent, criticized the Court’s reluctance to act:
“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country.”
What’s Next for Gun Rights and the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court’s recent rulings have expanded Second Amendment protections, including its landmark 2022 Bruen decision, which struck down New York’s restrictive concealed carry laws. However, the Court has yet to clarify whether AR-15 bans violate the “text, history, and tradition” test established in Bruen.
Justice Kavanaugh suggested that waiting for more appellate court rulings would help the Supreme Court make a more informed decision. But with multiple challenges pending in other circuits, a definitive ruling could come as early as 2025 or 2026.
Key Takeaways:
-
The Supreme Court avoided ruling on AR-15 bans for now, but conservative justices are preparing for a future showdown.
-
Maryland’s ban remains in place, but similar laws in other states face ongoing legal challenges.
-
Justice Kavanaugh’s statement suggests the Court will likely take up an AR-15 case within the next two years.
-
The outcome could either solidify or dismantle state-level bans, impacting millions of gun owners.
A Pivotal Moment for Gun Rights
The Supreme Court’s hesitation to intervene now means AR-15 bans will remain in place for the time being. However, with Justice Kavanaugh’s strong hint that the Court will soon take up the issue, gun rights advocates may soon get a definitive answer on whether these rifles are protected under the Second Amendment.
For now, the legal battle continues, and the future of civilian rifle ownership hangs in the balance.
Interested in purchasing a firearm for yourself? Visit Keystone Shooting Center for a wide selection of firearms, expert advice, and top-notch training. Stay informed and exercise your Second Amendment rights responsibly!
